"Fascinating," in the word of Mr. Spock. . . . So he's
admitting that (a) they might sell netters' stuff, and (b) their
intentions might change at any time. (Not that they *will* or
their intentions *will*change*, however leaving the door open
means you can always walk through it if you want to.)
No, I'm "admitting" nothing. I'm saying that I'm not
authorized to make any decisions about what we sell or don't
sell. If I intimate that I DO make those decisions, I'll have to
deal with complaints from product managers, etc. My intent is to
get as close to saying it without actually saying it as I can.
For a straight answer, ask Tim Brown, Willard Martens, or Pres.
Lorraine Williams. They're able to make some calls about what
gets sold.
Further, I find it unlikely in the extreme that a company with
as sharp a legal team as ours is going to simply grab someone's
stuff and publish it without permission. I don't think that's
lawful, and I'm certain the legal people would mention it during
some meeting or other. :)